← All articles

Sex before the fight — a myth with one exception, and a weak one

A review of nine studies found no negative effect of sexual activity the day before a competition. The famous 'less than two hours' rests on eleven men.

Redakcja HardModeChallenge · updated August 2, 2026

A treadmill test printout. Two heart rate curves lie on top of each other throughout the effort and part only slightly during recovery. Captions: VO2max no effect, 11 men.

Muhammad Ali reportedly abstained for six weeks before a fight. Coaches have been passing the rule down for a century, and athletes repeat it to each other in changing rooms as settled fact. It even has a folk mechanism: aggression, testosterone, "conserved energy".

A systematic review of nine studies says something else.

What the review found

The present evidence suggests that sexual activity the day before competition does not exert any negative impact on performance, even though high-quality, randomized controlled studies are urgently needed.

That is the sentence from the conclusion[1]. Its second half is worth as much attention as its first, because the authors state plainly that the design of the available studies is not strong and probably does not reflect real-life situations.

The one exception, up close

The review carries a caveat that has taken on a life of its own online: that a negative effect occurs when less than two hours pass between intercourse and the test.

That caveat comes from a single study. Boone and Gilmore, 1995, eleven sedentary men — not athletes[2].

What it actually found:

  • Maximal aerobic power, oxygen pulse and double product — unaffected.
  • The only significant differences were in heart rate at 5 and 10 minutes of the recovery phase in the test run about two hours after intercourse.
  • In the test performed later the same day, the differences were gone.

So where does the belief come from

Probably from two things at once. First, "the night before" cannot be separated from what people do around it: a later bedtime, alcohol, less sleep. Those are variables with well-documented effects on performance, and none of them is sex.

Second, pre-competition rituals work whether or not they have a mechanism. An athlete who believes abstinence strengthens him gets predictability and a sense of control, and those are worth more than most supplements.

There is no reason to take such a ritual away from anybody. There is a reason not to sell it as a research finding, because the research says something more modest: the day before makes no difference, and everything beyond that was measured on eleven men off the sofa.

Short answers

Does sex the day before a competition hurt performance?
A systematic review of nine studies concludes that it does not — while the authors themselves note that the quality of the available studies is poor.

Sources

  1. [1]Stefani et al., 'Sexual Activity before Sports Competition: A Systematic Review', Frontiers in Physiology 2016

    Full text checked: 2026-08-02

  2. [2]Boone & Gilmore, 'Effects of sexual intercourse on maximal aerobic power, oxygen pulse, and double product in male sedentary subjects', J Sports Med Phys Fitness 1995

    Full text checked: 2026-08-02

More on this

Why there is an app attached

Not to count days — a sheet of paper does that. To make the challenge something you go through with people you already know, which is the one thing in this whole category with decent evidence behind it.

See how it works